Name | Karen Ryan |
---|
Title | Executive Director, Government Relations |
---|
Email | Email hidden; Javascript is required. |
---|
GOAL 1 | Contribute to the Office of Research increase Research Expenditures (H/K Key Indicator – Research Expenditures/yr)
|
---|
Goal Type | Strategic |
---|
Hoshin? | Yes |
---|
% Weight | 30 |
---|
Action(s)/Initiatives(s) | - Draft appropriations requests to federal government for Hypersonics Consortium
- Annually draft appropriation requests (aka ‘Congressionally Directed Spending or Community Funded Projects) in support of NCI designation or other priorities determined by leadership
- Collaborate with VPR on internal approval process for appropriation support
- Organize and execute ‘Research Showcase’ in DC
- Advocate for increase in federal budget for agencies relevant to UC (NIH, NSF, DOE, DOD)
- Draft long-term strategy for engaging and enlisting federal government in UC’s goal for NCI designation
- Plan and execute relationship building activities: 1. Facilitate Hill visits for campus stakeholder (President, SVP Health Affairs, VPR, identified faculty members with active grants or in pursuit of grants) 2. Invite/host delegation and staff on campus 3. Address election outcomes impacting targeted relationship building
- Begin conversations at state level about state support for research
|
---|
Measurable Outcomes(s) | - Federal government increase budget for relevant agencies
- OoR expenditures increase
- Hypersonics Consortium request included in omnibus budget bill
- Submitted CDS/CFP to Congress
|
---|
GOAL 2 | Increase or maintain state funding for UC (H/K Key Indicator – Operating Margin)
|
---|
Goal Type | Strategic |
---|
Hoshin? | Yes |
---|
% Weight | 40 |
---|
Action(s)/Initiatives(s) | - Create and execute advocacy plan for increasing/maintaining: 1. SSI; 2. Clinical Teaching lines; 3. UC specific line items
- Strengthen relationships with General Assembly by conducting a regular cadence of meetings with relevant members of the GA (SW Ohio, House and Senate Higher Ed and House and Senate Finance)
- Draft talking points of strategic importance of SSI for use in meeting with GA
- Facilitate UC “Roadshow” to Columbus with relevant campus stakeholders
- Invite targeted members of GA to campus
- Keep campus community informed of higher ed climate in Columbus
- Work with IUC on advocating for budget priorities
|
---|
Measurable Outcomes(s) | - Increased/maintained state funding of SSI, Clinical Teaching Lines and UC Line items
- Operating Margin
|
---|
GOAL 3 | Mitigate or negate adverse impact of detrimental legislation on UC (H/K Key Indicator – Enrollment & Economic Impact?)
|
---|
Goal Type | Operational |
---|
Hoshin? | No |
---|
% Weight | 20 |
---|
Action(s)/Initiatives(s) | - Create relationship maps identifying higher ed champions or detractors
- Equip champions with UC data, highlights and success stories to defend against adverse legislation and promote advantages of higher ed
- Lobby/build relationships with detractors with UC data, highlights and success stories
|
---|
Measurable Outcomes(s) | - Adverse legislation defeated or mitigated via amendments
|
---|
GOAL 4 | Amplify UC voice and reputation at state and federal level.
|
---|
Goal Type | Operational |
---|
Hoshin? | No |
---|
% Weight | 5 |
---|
Action(s)/Initiatives(s) | - Create and execute advocacy plans that supports UC strengths: 1. Policy opportunities to advance and scale gen-1 programs, 2. Workforce 3. Research and Innovation
- Increase UC presences at state and federal levels: 1. UC leadership and policy makers (and/or staff), 2. Other opportunities as they arise (Science Coalition (fed), Council of Deans(state)
|
---|
Measurable Outcomes(s) | - UC as a thought leader and resource for GA on issues of higher ed and workforce (How to measure this?)
|
---|
GOAL 5 | Goal: Strengthen relationship with City of Cincinnati. (for our discussion) H/K Key indicator?
|
---|
Goal Type | Operational |
---|
Hoshin? | No |
---|
% Weight | 5 |
---|
Action(s)/Initiatives(s) | - Clearly identify and communicate shared priorities between UC and City
- Educate council and mayor’s office on UC strategic direction and brief the same on issues as they arise
- Invite mayor, city manager, members of council to campus
- Regular cadence of meetings with city officials to ensure open lines of communication between UC and city
|
---|
Measurable Outcomes(s) | - City is timely and responsive to UC needs (How to measure this?)
|
---|
Overall Submission Entry Notes |
|